Platform engineering is often sold as a promise of faster delivery, fewer broken pipelines, happier developers, and less time spent on repetitive work. But once the platform is in place, you may feel overwhelmed by the need to integrate CI/CD data, optimize flows, build internal developer portals, and implement shared infrastructure modules. Sometimes you may wonder whether the effort is worth it to invest in the platform.
That’s where platform engineering metrics come in. If you measure the right signals, you can see whether your platform is accelerating teams or quietly becoming a source of friction. If you measure the wrong ones, you’ll end up with dashboards full of numbers that look impressive but don’t help decisions.
This article breaks down 12 practical metrics that platform teams can track to understand developer experience, efficiency, reliability, and business impact.
A platform team’s job is not only to build capabilities. It’s to make software delivery easier, safer, and faster for product teams. The right measurement helps you:
Also, metrics create shared language. Instead of debating opinions like “the portal feels slow,” you can discuss and base your decisions on facts like “average latency has increased 30% since the last release.”
These are the metrics your developers feel every day. If they’re bad, teams won’t be able to get the maximum out of the platform.
Definition: The time period between when a code change is merged (or committed) and when that change is live in production.
This is one of the oldest DORA metrics, yet it remains an important indicator of flow in the delivery process. The shorter the lead time, the less likely you are to experience bottlenecks in the delivery process, slower reviews, complex processes, environments, or pipelines.
How to measure:
Why it matters for platform teams:
Common pitfalls:
Definition: How often teams deploy to production (or a user-facing environment).
Frequent deployments are not the goal by themselves. But they often indicate whether pipelines are stable, releases are low-risk, and teams trust the platform.
How to measure:
Why it matters:
Tip: Pair this with the change failure rate (Metric #7) to balance speed and safety.
Definition: Time for a new developer (or a new team) to go from “access granted” to “first meaningful change shipped.”
This is one of the most honest signals of platform usability. If onboarding takes weeks, your platform may be powerful but not usable. Track milestones like access to repos, CI, clusters, and environments, local dev setup time, first successful pipeline run, and first production deploy.
Why it matters:
Onboarding time reflects documentation quality, automation maturity, and day-one experience. It reduces dependency on tribal knowledge.
A platform that scales delivery but burns money is not successful. These metrics help you run the platform like both a product and an engineering system.
Definition: How efficiently you’re using compute, storage, and other cloud resources.
Examples:
Why it matters:
Practical approach:
Definition: Cost of the platform broken down per team, service, or product
This means the metric flips the cost conversation from blame to choice. It allows teams to see how architecture and usage drive cost.
How to implement:
Why it matters:
This is where many teams build an engineering KPI dashboard that combines delivery metrics and cost signals, which is useful as long as it stays actionable.
Definition: Percentage of operational and delivery tasks that are automated vs. manual.
Automation coverage directly reduces toil. It also reduces variability (humans don’t run playbooks the same way every time).
What to count:
A simple way to compute it:
# Count of deployments executed via standard pipeline (automated)
platform_deployments_total{mode="pipeline"} 12450
# Count of deployments executed manually (break-glass)
platform_deployments_total{mode="manual"} 37Platform engineering often increases speed. But speed without stability just creates more problems in the long run.
Definition: Percentage of deployments that result in failure requiring remediation (rollback, hotfix, incident, or degraded service).
A “failure” should be defined clearly. Don’t dilute it. If your definition is too broad, it becomes noisy. Too narrow, and it becomes meaningless.
Why it matters:
Actionable follow-ups:
Definition: Average time to restore service after an incident.
MTTR is heavily influenced by platform capabilities, including observability quality (logs, metrics, traces), alert signal-to-noise ratio, runbook quality, rollback speed, and incident tooling.
How to make it useful:
Why it matters:
Definition: Availability of platform services used by developers.
This includes CI/CD runners and build systems, artifact registries, an internal developer portal, secrets management, and environment provisioning services.
Why it matters:
Practical guidance:
These metrics show whether the platform is used and whether it improves outcomes beyond engineering.
Definition: How widely platform features are used.
If teams aren’t adopting the “golden path,” your platform is not the default route; it’s more like optional documentation.
How to measure:
Interpretation matters:
This is a key part of understanding real-world platform metrics since usage is often the clearest proof of value.
Definition: A lightweight sentiment measure, often asked as:
Satisfaction is not soft; it predicts whether developers will use the platform, contribute improvements, and stop building side paths.
How to run it well:
Pro tip: Tag responses by team and workflow (CI, environments, portal). Patterns will show up fast.
Definition: How long it takes to go from an idea (ticket created, spec approved) to a production feature.
Unlike lead time (commit to production), cycle time captures planning delays, environment waiting time, dependency constraints, testing, and release coordination.
Why it matters:
How platform teams influence it:
Vanity metrics create comfort, not clarity. For example, the number of portal page views doesn’t add value without linking to outcomes, or the number of pipelines created without adoption or success rates doesn’t add any value. Instead, ask:
A healthy measurement system leads to targeted improvements, not just reporting.
If you track everything, you’ll learn nothing. But if you track the right 12 metrics, you’ll get a clear view of platform value:
DevEx and flow: lead time, deployment frequency, and onboarding time.
Efficiency: utilization, cost allocation, and automation coverage.
Reliability: change failure rate, MTTR, and uptime.
Business value: adoption, satisfaction, and idea-to-delivery cycle time.
The goal isn’t a perfect dashboard. The goal is a platform that improves outcomes and a measurement system that tells the truth about where you are today and what to fix next.
DevOps metrics often focus on delivery and operations outcomes for a product or team. Platform metrics focus on how the platform enables many teams at once, including adoption, self-service success, and platform reliability. There’s overlap (DORA metrics), but platform teams also need product-style metrics, such as adoption and satisfaction.
Executives usually care about outcomes and risk:
Keep it tight. Show trends and business impact, not raw telemetry.
Tie each metric to a decision. If a metric can’t trigger an action (improve pipelines, remove toil, fix reliability), it’s probably vanity. Also, pair metrics (speed and stability) so the story stays honest.
Yes. Shared definitions (What counts as a failure? What is “onboarded”?) reduce arguments. A small, consistent set of metrics helps product, security, and platform teams align on trade-offs and priorities.
Review core metrics weekly or biweekly. Re-evaluate the full set quarterly. Platforms evolve, your measurement should evolve too. Retire metrics that don’t change decisions.
Sign up to our newsletter
By subscribing, you accept our Privacy Policy.
